Blog
Purpose
1. to provide the legal and business communities a curated series of articles …
… to keep pace with the rapid and sweeping societal changes initiated by the rise of AI while mitigating the risks of government overreach or excessive litigation.
2. to provide a private forum for members of The Sedona Conference Working Group 13 on AI Law to engage in an ongoing dialogue…
… advancing its efforts to draft consensus, nonpartisan commentaries, including Principles and Best Practice recommendations to move the law forward “in a reasoned and just way.”
*Note: Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or the formation of any attorney-client relationship. See Disclaimers.
Sponsors
AIVN
The Sedona Conference
Interested in sponsoring the Ko IP & AI Law blog? Contact us at webhost@koailaw.com.
-
In LLM Providers We Trust…? [Conclusion of the Parsing the Blame for AI series]
I. When Software Fails: The Challenges of Proving Liability A. Why strict product liability doesn’t compute for software [see Part 1 here] B. Negligence [see Part 2 here] C. Limitation of Liability Provisions Are More Enforceable for Software [see Part 2 here] II. GenAI: The Ultimate in Diffusion-of-Responsibility Technology A. Differences between Software and AI…
-
Oops, AI did it again [Part 4 of the Parsing the Blame for AI series]
I. When Software Fails: The Challenges of Proving Liability A. Why strict product liability doesn’t compute for software [see Part 1 here] B. Negligence [see Part 2 here] C. Limitation of Liability Provisions Are More Enforceable for Software [see Part 2 here] II. GenAI: The Ultimate in Diffusion-of-Responsibility Technology A. Differences between Software and AI…
-
GenAI: The Ultimate in Diffusion-of-Responsibility Technology [Part 3 of the Parsing the Blame series]
Generative AI (GenAI) has transformed how businesses and individuals leverage artificial intelligence. However, it also introduces unprecedented challenges in assigning accountability and managing liability for AI-generated content or decisions.
-
Software and negligence and contract law [Part 2 of the Parsing the Blame for AI series]
Who will be liable when an AI implementation harms either its users or unrelated third parties? In Part 1 of this series last week, we explored how software is presumptively treated as a “service”—not a “product”—and thus is not subject to strict product liability law. So what theories of liability are applicable when software output…
-
Software and product liability law [Part 1 of the Parsing the Blame for AI series]
Explore the complexities of AI liability in the evolving legal landscape. From product liability to on-presmises software to software-as-a-service (SaaS), uncover how laws for tangible goods differ from those governing intangible services like AI. Delve into key cases, challenges, and the implications for accountability in our interconnected AI age.
-
Does the LLMperor Have New Clothes? Some Thoughts on the Use of LLMs in eDiscovery
By Maura R. Grossman, Gordon V. Cormack, and Jason R. Baron I. Introduction: A Parable As Hans Christian Andersen’s parable goes, an emperor was—above all else—obsessed with showing off his new clothes. Approached by a pair of swindlers, who purported to be weavers of the most magnificent and uncommonly fine fabrics, he was convinced by…
-
The Sedona Conference Launches Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence and the Law
The Sedona Conference, one of the nation’s leading nonpartisan think-tanks on issues of law and technology, will be launching its Working Group 13 on Artificial Intelligence and the Law in January, building on its long-standing reputation in the areas of eDiscovery, digital records management, patent litigation, trade secrets, cybersecurity, data privacy, and cross-border data transfers.…
-
The Sedona Conference publishes article on Testing the Limits of the IP Legal Regimes: The Unique Challenges of AI
When Paul R. Michel was approached about co-authoring a paper on the substantive issues that generative artificial intelligence poses to intellectual property law, the retired chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit didn’t think the challenges were all that formidable. But as Judge Michel and co-author Jim W. Ko began…
-
Sedona’s patent law working groups tackle the puzzle of GenAI and “inventorship”
I will be in Tampa next week, trading the record-breaking heat of Phoenix for the humidity of Florida. But I’m not flying east for the weather. I’ll be attending joint annual meeting of The Sedona Conference’s Working Groups 9 (patent damages and remedies) and 10 (patent litigation best practices) at the Hotel Haya. I’m looking…
-
Ko-Michel article on IP and AI law forthcoming
Jim W. Ko is co-authoring a paper on Testing the Limits of the IP Legal Regimes: The Unique Challenges of Artificial Intelligence with former Chief Judge Paul Michel of the Federal Circuit, in conjunction with The Sedona Conference’s upcoming Conference on AI and IP Law . Can the policy objectives behind the current intellectual property…